logo_text_trans.gif
Click to see the XML version of this web page.
Tuesday, December 17, 2002

Roots of inequality?

[ This is a comment I made in the running response to this post on Azeem Azhar's Weblog. Azeem, formerly a tech writer at The Guardian, has since worked as a high-tech consultant and startup CEO. ]

Bernardo Huberman thinks Web sites drive to power law distributions in part because of math. For whatever reason (slashdotting, celebrity), a site becomes popular. Since the Web is growing, at any time interval, hits increase for all 'live' Web sites above some threshold of activity.

Assume that the growth is the same per cent for all sites at each interval: then the leading sites will begin to pull away since they continually increase by a larger number of page reads or links relative to others, since their growth is a percentage of a larger base.

If growth is unequal (which I think is the actual case), and more popular sites grow faster, then the effect is amplified further. Positive feedback loop, predictable outcome. Since there are finite Web surfers during any interval, the big ones get bigger at the expense of the little ones.

Wealth works the same way: people who have only a little bit more than their neighbors can save and make investments and earn interest, where the poor neighbor can only just afford to pay the bills. Small sums, invested, compounded over time, can become quite large. Larger sums get even bigger even faster.

So, it's luck and small differences in initial conditions... I would wager there is a white paper in Complexity Theory circles somewhere that describes a similar mechanism. We humans of course, stand ever ready to attach racial or cultural signifigance to this, when it's probably just luck and math (read Jared Diamond's Guns, Germs and Steel about the roots of inequality, if you haven't already).

Interestingly, though, there can be lots of domains where this operates. A really popular Weblog doesn't get anything like the hits that a popular portal does: yet it's enough to make a few celebs... Dave Winer and Doc Searls come to mind.

So if you can't win on one battlefield, start a new one... BTW I will shortly start a 'Robot Noise' Web site where we'll try a few experiments to test some of the theories proposed here and elsewhere...
Comments 5:28:02 PM    




Top of page | Home | About gulker.com | About Chris Gulker

Updated 4/16/04; 1:50:53 PM

Chris Gulker's view from Silicon Valley - in words and pictures

Updated 4/16/04; 1:50:53 PM


December 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
Nov   Feb

Gulker Photo Archive Logo

Features & Categories:
Columns (soon)
Dotcom Garden
Lone Genius Hackers
Picture Weblog
Theory & Strategy
Weblogging

gulker.com Cam
gulker.com Cam

Interesting blogs et al.:

AlwaysOn Network
Natalie d'Arbeloff
Azeem Azhar
Ken Bereskin
Blogging Ecosysytem
Blogging Network
BlogStreet
Boing Boing
Tim Bray
Matt Croydon
DaveNet
Rael Dornfest
Esther Dyson
Dave Farber's IP
Dave Fitch
David Galbraith
John Getze
William Gibson
Dan Gillmor
James Gleick
Bernie Goldbach
Meg Hourihan
Joi Ito
Xeni Jardin
Jeff Jarvis
Linux Journal
Mitch Kapor
Kuro5hin
Gunnar Langemark
Joshua Levy
Scott Loftesness
Macintouch
Ross Mayfield
Hans Moravec
Rafe Needleman
Nonsense Verse
OS Opinion
Tim Porter
Recommended Reading
Reverse Cowgirl
Glenn Reynolds
Roger Ridey
Phil Ringnalda
John Robb
Scott Rosenberg
Anita Rowland
Brent Simmons
Robert Scoble
Doc Searls
Jessica Shea
Gavin Sheridan
Shifted Librarian
Stefan Smalla
Bruce Sterling
Scripting News
Slashdot
Dan Shafer
John Tringham
Jon Udell
Moicho Umeda
Philipp Weltentummler
Kevin Werbach
Amy Wohl

Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

Subscribe to "Weblogging" in Radio UserLand.






Google